Ranjeet Kumar Sah @ Ranjeet Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13954 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-495 Year-2025 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar Sah @ Ranjeet Sah S/o- Baban Sah Resident of villageMahmadpur PO- Parsa PS- Dariyapur District-Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shyameshwar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 of the B.N.S.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 01.08.2025 at 2:30 P.M., the petitioner came and started abusing, on objection assaulted him by lathi causing injury on head and taken to hospital and after getting treated, the instant F.I.R. was lodged.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that from perusal of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13954 of 2026(3) dt.04-05-2026 2/3 allegation as alleged F.I.R., it would manifest that no reason or motive for the occurrences alleged, it is further submitted that from the side of the petitioner, Dariyapur P.S. Case No.496 of 2025 has been instituted against the informant and his side alleging that informant assault him by knife causing injury on his palm. It is also submitted that petitioner is driver of the informant and he had gone to seek his wages when petitioner abused and assaulted him and also instituted the instant false case. It is further submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R., it would manifest that informant alleges that after being treated by the Doctor, the instant F.I.R. was instituted which amply demonstrate that injury was not serious. It is reiterated and submitted that the informants for reasons best known deliberately concealed the fact that petitioner is his driver and that gone to seek his wage when altercation took place and thereafter he came to be implicated in the instant false case.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13954 of 2026(3) dt.04-05-2026 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 495 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Satyavrat Verma, J) sanjeev/- U T