Ramvilash Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33063 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -258 Year- 2016 Thana -KISHUNPUR District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Ramvilash Yadav son of Bindeshwar Yadav,

2. Rupesh Yadav, son of Ramdeo Yadav, Both residents of Village- Murli, Police Station- Kishanpur, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Arun, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 19-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are in custody since 17.05.2017 in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 258 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 447 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in connection with land dispute. The injuries said to have been caused by assault attributed to the petitioners are simple in nature. Other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 8053 of 2017.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 258 of 2016 on the following conditions :- (i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relative other than the petitioners herein.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33063 of 2017 (3) dt.19-08-2017 2/2 (ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T