← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4668/2019dismissed

Anuradha Kumari v. Chancellor Universities Of Bihar And ORS

2024-02-05Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4668 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Anuradha Kumari W/o Viveka Nand Jha, C/o Manohar Jha,Resident of Jail Hata Daltanganj,Dist.-Palamu (Jharkhand)-822101 2.

Arvind Kumari Tiwary S/o Viveka Nand Tiwary Resident of At Rafugee Colony,New Area,Hamidganj,Ward No.1,Daltanganj,Dist.-Palamu, (Jharkhand)-822101 3.

Kamala Dhar Mishra S/o Late Lallan Mishra Resident of Mahinawa,Bagicha,P.S. Maner,Dist.-Patna-801108 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Chancellor Universities of Bihar and ors Raj Bhawan,Patna 2.

The Vice Chancellor Magadh University,Bodh Gaya 3.

Tlhe Registrar Magadh University,Bodh Gaya 4.

The Controller of Examination Magadh University,Bodh Gaya 5.

The Principal, Deptt. and Education,Magadh University,Bodh Gaya 6.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Higher Education Human Resource Development Department Govt. of Bihar,Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajib Ranjan Jha :

Mr. Shri Nath Pathak For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy 1 ( Sc13 ) :

Mr. S.S. Tiwary (Ac to AAG13) For the Magadh University :

Mr. Siddharth Prasad :

Mr. Nirmal Kumar Singh For Chancellor of University :

Mr. Rajendra Kumar Giri :

Mr. Nikhil Kumar Agarwal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-02-2024

1. Heard the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have completed pre-Ph.D course work on 04.10.2016 and have submitted synopsis but the meeting of Post Graduate Research Council (P.G.R.C.) was not

Patna High Court CWJC No.4668 of 2019(5) dt.05-02-2024 2/2 being held, as such, the registration of the petitioners was not done for Ph.D courses. Accordingly, the present writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondent/University to hold the meeting of Post Graduate Research Council (P.G.R.C.).

3. Mr. Siddharth Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the Magadh University, under instruction from his client, submits that petitioners name have already been recommended by the Post Graduate Research Council (P.G.R.C.) for registration in Ph.D for research under the supervision of Ms. Sunita Suman, Professor of P.G. Department in Psychology, and the topic has also been approved.

4. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the University, this writ application has become infructuous, accordingly, the present writ application is dismissed as infructuous.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) HarshPandey/- U