Arun Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14055 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2021 Thana- PATEPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
ARUN THAKUR Son of Raghunath Thakur Resident of Village - Mahiya Malpur, P.s.- Patepur, Distt.- Hajipur at Vaishali. 2.
ARVIND THAKUR SON OF RAGHUNATH THAKUR Resident of Village - Mahiya Malpur, P.s.- Patepur, Distt.- Hajipur at Vaishali. 3.
GEETA DEVI W/O RAGHUNATH THAKUR Resident of Village - Mahiya Malpur, P.s.- Patepur, Distt.- Hajipur at Vaishali. 4.
MUNNI DEVI W/O ARUN THAKUR Resident of Village - Mahiya Malpur, P.s.- Patepur, Distt.- Hajipur at Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bijay Bhushan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation is that the accused persons including the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14055 of 2022(2) dt.01-04-2022 2/3 petitioners caused death of the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are brothers-in-law, petitioner No.3 is mother-in-law and petitioner No.4 is sister-in-law of the deceased. They are separate in mess and property from the husband of the deceased. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged occurrence. The husband of the deceased is in custody.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the complaint case/F.I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hajipur at Vaishali in connection with Patepur P.S.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14055 of 2022(2) dt.01-04-2022 3/3 case No.82 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T