Anil Sahu @ Anil Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14905 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2024 Thana- JAMHOR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Anil Sahu @ Anil Kumar Sahu S/O Omkarnath Sahu Resident of Kasari Masari P.S.- Dhumanganj, Dist.- Prayagraj, UP ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sadanand Roy, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh., APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL ORAL ORDER 12-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. This is the first regular bail application of the petitioner seeking his regular bail in connection with Jamhore P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 338, 336 (3), 340(2), 3(5) the B.N.S. 2023 and 25(1-5) (a), 26, 35 of Arms Act.

3. According to the case of prosecution, on the basis of information received from the informant Police officials reached the spot. On being searched, the huge quantity of live cartridges recovered from the possession of co-accused Salik Kumar and Uttam Kumar. It is alleged that both of them were purchased the said cartridges from the present applicant. On the basis of that, present applicant has been arrested on 02.01.2025 and since then he is in custody.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14905 of 2025(3) dt.12-05-2025 2/2 petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no any recovery made by the prosecution from the present applicant. He is in custody since 02.01.2025. The trial is still going on, it will take some more time, therefore on these grounds it is prayed that he may be granted benefit of bail.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the arguments raised by the counsel for the petitioner.

6. Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and further considering the fact that no any article has been seized from the possession of this applicant and is in custody since 02.01.2025, I am of the view that the petitioner should be enlarged on bail.

7. Accordingly, the application is allowed.

8. The petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two local sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-7, Aurangabad in connection with Jamhore P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024. (Arvind Singh Chandel , J) krishnakant/- U T