Bhim Yadav @ Hari Mohan @ Pahadiful @ Lulha @ Hari Mohan Ji v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43699 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2014 Thana -AMAS District- GAYA ====================================================== Bhim Yadav @ Hari Mohan @ Pahadiful @ Lulha @ Hari Mohan Ji, son of Late Kheman Yadav, resident of village Mainka, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S. Jamil Akhtar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar -2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 26 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 353, 345, 332, 395, 120B, 121A, 124A of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and 17 of CLA Act.

Petitioner is named in the FIR.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been made accused only on the basis of suspicion and nothing has been recovered from his possession. Further submission is that petitioner is a handicapped person and at the instance of police he has been made accused in this case.

Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43699 of 2017 (4) dt.06-11-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of facts and circumstances, as stated above, and also considering the fact that he is accused in 12 other cases, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner.

With the above observation, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U