Kriti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14269 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2020 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali ====================================================== KRITI KUMARI D/O RAJ KUMAR THAKUR R/v- Inayatpur Prabodhi, P.S.- Sarai, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 365 of the IPC and later on Section 302/120(B)/34 of the IPC was added.

It is a case of commission of murder to the informant's brother and then the FIR is against unknown. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. No one is the eye witness of the alleged occurrence. Only on the basis of telephonic communication between the deceased and the petitioner, her name has been dragged in the present case. In fact, there was love affair between the deceased and the petitioner, so there was regular telephonic communication.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14269 of 2023(3) dt.24-07-2023 2/2 During investigation, no consistent material has come against the petitioner to show her involvement in the present case save and except, telephonic call. Similarly situated other accused person has already been enlarged on bail by another coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.02.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37992 of 2021. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and she is languishing in judicial custody since 30.12.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM16, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 295 of 2020.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U