Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55694/2017bail granted

Punit Kumar Dubey @ Punit Dubey v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-13Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55694 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -194 Year- 2016 Thana -BHORE District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Punit Kumar Dubey @ Punit Dubey son of Bipin Bihari Dubey @ Bipin Dubey, resident of Village- Semarauna, P.S. Bhore, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 12.04.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12639 of 2017, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 22.12.2016, due to land dispute the petitioner has been implicated in this case, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and Arvind Dubey and Bipin Dubey, against whom there is specific allegation, have already been allowed bail by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 28076 of 2017 and 23962 of 2017, vide Annexure4, and as such the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that two co-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55694 of 2017 (3) dt.13-12-2017 2/2 accused, against whom there is specific allegation, have already been allowed bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M-XII, Gopalganj in connection with Bhore P.S. Case No. 194 of 2016/ G.R. No. 3285 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T