Ravi Kant Ujala @ Manoj Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24618 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2020 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== RAVI KANT UJALA @ MANTU PASWAN Son of Suraj Paswan Resident of Village - Sondihara, P.S.- Shivsagar, Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the name of the petitioner in the cause title of the petition in course of the day.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302, 201, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code in which section 306 IPC was added later on. The prosecution allegation, in short, is that the the son of the informant was found dead and the informant suspects that the petitioner and other accused persons have killed him. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24618 of 2021(2) dt.02-03-2022 2/2 tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of suspicion. Except for suspicion, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. The body of the deceased is alleged to have been found on the Railway track. The Investigating Officer has also doubted the case to be under section 302 IPC. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 186/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T