Brajesh Kumar Singh @ Brajesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19221 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2016 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Brajesh Kumar Singh @ Brajesh Singh, S/o late Baleshwar Singh, R/o Rajendra Sarowar, Power house Colony, Chapra, P.S. Bhagwan Bazar, Chapra, Distt. Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Informant :

Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 18-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail which was earlier rejected vide order dated 29.06.2017, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12067 of 2017, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 20.10.2016 and uptill now only four prosecution witnesses have been examined out of them two have turned hostile.

The learned A.P.P. duly assisted by learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner is the assailant as he has assaulted the informant with bat, he was arrested with fire-arm and thereafter he has been remanded in this case and he has confessed his guilt

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19221 of 2018(2) dt.18-04-2018 2/2 also.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, at present, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of the bail, again prayer of the bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Sessions Trail No. 722 of 2016/172 of 2017, arising out of Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 56 of 2016, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge II, Saran at Chapra.

However, considering the detention of the petitioner, the learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within six months, from date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which if the petitioner at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) khushbu/- U T