← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4767/2016disposed

Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-06-20Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4767 of 2016 ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Son of Late Siya Ram Singh, Resident of Village- Sokhara, P.O Barauni, P.S. Fulwariya, District- Begusarai, presently posted as Block Agriculture Officer, Gaunaha, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.

5.

The Rural Development Officer, Gaunaha, District- West Champaran at Bettiah.

6.

7.

The Rural Development Officer, Ladania, District- Madhubani. The Sub Divisional Officer, Jainagar District Madhubani ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Manglam For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sita Ram Yadav, GP 16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 20-06-2019 Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead Sub Divisional Officer, Jainagar district Madhubani as respondent no. 7 to the writ petition in course of the day. Mr. Manglam counsel for the petitioner submits that in respect of alleged advances, petitioner would be submitting detailed representation along with copy of vouchers submitted earlier alongwith the details of date of submission, so as to facilitate reconciliation/ adjustment of the amounts for which valid utilization has been submitted by the petitioner before Sub

Patna High Court CWJC No.4767 of 2016(2) dt.20-06-2019 2/2 divisional Officer, Jainagar ( respondent no.7). In the event such application is submitted along with detail, respondent no.7 should consider the same in accordance with law and having regard to the rules in this regard and take a final decision upon adjustment of the petitioner to which petitioner is entitled by reasoned and speaking order. Petitioner's counsel submits that he would be submitting representation within four weeks.

Let final decision be taken by respondent no. 7 within three months thereafter.

Writ petition stands disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) s.hassan/- U