Deepak Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36643 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-320 Year-2020 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH S/O Bechan Singh Resident of village - Odar, P.S. - Sonhan, District - Kaimur (Bhabua).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

M/s Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Bilas Rai Raman, APP For the Informant :

Ms. Kiran Kumari Sharma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 28-01-2022 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant through video conferencing.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 307 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have fired causing firearm injury on the brother of the informant.

It is submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. There is case and counter case between the parties. The petitioner is in custody since 4.1.2021 and chargesheet has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36643 of 2021(3) dt.28-01-2022 2/2 submitted in the case.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that from the injury report of the injured it would transpire that the injury has been found to be caused by gunshot (firearm injury) which is directly attributable to this petitioner and the same is grievous in nature. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into the consideration the facts of the case and the allegation against the petitioner, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Spd/- U T