Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16813/2025dismissed

Md. Nuruddine Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-13Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16813 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1199 Year-2024 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Md. Nuruddine Alam Son of Md.Naim Alam Resident of Village- Bhutahi, PS- Sinwarssha, Distt.- Sitamarhi 2.

Sonu Kumar Son of Jai Prakash Mahto Resident of Village- Bhutahi, PSSinwarssha, Distt.- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dr. Bipin Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State.

2. In this case, the petitioners are seeking regular bail in connection with NDPS Case No. 190 of 2024 arising out of Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1199 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20(b), (ii) B, 25, 29 of NDPS Act.

3. As per allegation, after getting information that some psychotropic substances were being carried by a whitecoloured car, the police intercepted the vehicle and recovered 10.2 kg of ganja from it. The petitioners and co-accused Rajan Kumar was arrested from that vehicle.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16813 of 2025(3) dt.13-05-2025 2/2

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. They are not the drivers of the vehicle wherefrom the alleged contraband was recovered. The petitioners are the persons of clean antecedent. He has further submitted that the quantity of ganja recovered from the vehicle, is less than the commercial quantity. The petitioners are under custody since 03.09.2024.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. The huge quantity of ganja was recovered from the car, wherein the petitioners were present.

7. Presently, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, it is rejected.

8. However, the petitioners, if so advised, may renew their prayer for bail after one year.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T