← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19832/2015dismissed

The State Of Bihar And ORS v. The Commissioner Patna Division And ORS

2023-03-24Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19832 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar,Patna. 3.The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.The Executive Engineer, Field Machinery Division, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Assistant Engineer, Field Machinery, Sub-Division, Government of Bihar, Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.

2. The Collector, Bhojpur at Arrah.

3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate-cum-House Controller, Sadar, Bhojpur at Arrah.

4.Motiur Rahman, Resident of Village Koilwar, P.S. Koilwar, Dist-Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar,Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raghwanand,GA-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 24-03-2023 Considering the fact that the original order was passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate-cum-House Controller, Sadar, Bhojpur on 16.03.1998 in B.B.C. Case No. 03 of 1997, fixing the rent to be paid by the petitioners for the premises under their occupation, to the landlord and thereafter, an appeal was belatedly filed bearing SCA No. 1 of 2004-05, before the learned Court of Collector, Bhojpur at Ara, which has also

Patna High Court CWJC No.19832 of 2015(2) dt.24-03-2023 2/2 been dismissed by an order dated 23.09.2006 and thereafter belatedly, the present writ petition has been filed only in the month of December, 2015, the learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to press the present writ petition, especially in view of the fact that this Court is not inclined to condone the gross delay and laches on the part of the petitioners, hence, the present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/sonalU