Ramashish Paswan v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25262 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2017 Thana -PAKARIBARAW District- NAWADA ====================================================== Ramashish Paswan, Son of Late Baso Paswan, Resident of Village-Dakra, P.S.-Akbarpur, District-Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar,

2. Urmila Devi, Wife of Sanjay Paswan, Resident of Village-Dhewadha, P.S.-Pakribrawan, District-Nawada.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 19 of 2017, registered under Sections 323, 365, 504, 506/34 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the D.P. Act.

The allegation of informant Urmila Devi is that he performed the marriage of his daughter with Dilip Paswan, son of the petitioner. After the marriage her daughter was kept in her matrimonial house properly, but after sometime her daughter was being tortured by her husband and in-laws due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. Thereafter, daughter of the informant returned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25262 of 2017 (3) dt.05-07-2017 2/2 to her Myaka, then all the persons came to the house of informant and accompanied her daughter and they hide her daughter.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner happens to father-in-law of the daughter of informant while allegation has been made about concealing the daughter of the informant by her husband and in-laws, but her informant herself as detailed in para-26 have stated that she has kept her daughter at the house of her Nanad and after submission of the first Chargesheet, the cognizance has been taken under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504, 506/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is in custody since 19.03.2017.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Pakribrawan P.S. Case No. 19 of 2017. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T