Satya Narayan Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15470 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-472 Year-2018 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Satya Narayan Yadav, aged about 62 years, Male, Son of Late Dukha Yadav 2.

Manoj Yadav @ Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, aged about 40 years, Male Son of Satya Narayan Yadav 3.

Lalan Yadav, aged about 35 years, Male, Son of Satya Narayan Yadav 4.

Deo Narayan Yadav @ Debuali @ Debu Yadav aged about 50 years, Male Son of Late Asharfi Yadav 5.

Runa Devi aged about 38 years, Female , Wife of Lalan Yadav 6.

Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Yadav aged about 30 years, Male Son of Ganesh Yadav 7.

Lalit Yadav @ Lalit Kumar Yadav, aged about 35 years, Male, Son of Satya Narayan Yadav 8.

Dharmendra Yadav @ Dharvindra Yadav, aged about 18 years, Male, Son of Bishundev Yadav 9.

Phulo Devi, aged about 30 years, Female, Wife of Lalit Yadav 10.

Manju Devi aged about 35 years, Female, Wife of Manoj Yadav 11.

Ganesh Prasad Yadav @ Ganesh Yadav aged about 24 years, Male Son of Ram Surat Yadav 12.

Kamlesh Kumar Yadav @ Kamlesh Yadav aged about 24 years, Male Son of Singheshwar Yadav 13.

Bishnudev Yadav @ Bishundev Yadav aged about 40 years, Male Son of Yugal Yadav 14.

Raj Karan Yadav @ Bhola @ Bhola Yadav aged about 38 years, Male Son of Munni Yadav 15.

Raju Kumar @ Raju Yadav aged about 18 years, Male Son of Lalan Yadav 16.

Anil Yadav aged about 30 years, Male Son of Dinesh Yadav 17.

Lalita Devi aged about 35 years, Female, Wife of Bishundev Yadav 18.

Girish Devi aged about 48 years, Female Wife of Arun Yadav All are resident of Village- Pipra, P.S.- Bahera, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15470 of 2019(2) dt.13-03-2019 2/3 13-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 354(A), 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 472 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and the first information report is against as many as 20 named accused persons. There is case and counter case between the parties relating to the and dispute. The thrust of specific accusation of assault upon the father of the informant is attributed to co-accused Vijay Yadav. The accusations against these petitioners are general and omnibus in nature. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Benipur, Darbhanga in connection Bahera P.S. Case No. 472 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. and with further conditions -- (i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives .

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That petitioner nos. 5, 9, 10, 17 and 18 shall be well represented in court on each and every date during trial except as and when directed by the learned court to be physically present and the remaining petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15470 of 2019(2) dt.13-03-2019 3/3 liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. BT/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T