Abhisekh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15330 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2025 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Abhisekh Kumar S/o Surendra Singh Resident of Village- Gosaldih, P.S.- Suraypur, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-03-2026 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 15.01.2026 in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 214 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 13.07.2025 for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S.S.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other accused persons are alleged to have snatched Rs. 17,000/- cash from the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15330 of 2026(2) dt.11-03-2026 2/3 FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name has been transpired during investigation on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused person, namely, Abhishek Kumar, son of Buddhan Singh and Buddhan Singh stated in his confessional statement that he has purchased the mobile in question from the petitioner and except the confessional statement, no other cogent material has come during investigation to show the involvement of petitioner in the present occurrence. He further submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 15.01.2026.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also the fact that the petitioner has clean antecedent and the name of petitioner transpired on the basis of confessional statement, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 214 of 2025, with the following conditions:
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15330 of 2026(2) dt.11-03-2026 3/3 properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ranjeet/- U T