Hira Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31582 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -125 Year- 2015 Thana -BELDAUR District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Hira Yadav, Son of Anirudh Yadav, Resident of Village- Chak Hussaini, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 125 of 2015, registered under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer for bail of the petitioner was refused on 28.04.2016 vide Criminal Miscellaneous No. 9662 of 2016, because looted mobile of the informant was said to have been recovered from the house of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 13.07.2015.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case and period of detention, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31582 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017 2/2 Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge-IIIrd, Khagaria in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 125 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T