← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16669/2024bail granted

Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-14Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16669 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-499 Year-2023 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Vaishali ====================================================== SURAJ KUMAR SON OF UMESH SAHNI RESIDENT OF MOHALLA - SAWAYAN, P.S. - SONEPUR, DISTRICT - SARAN (CHHAPRA) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar-1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-03-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(i), 32(iii) and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

4. Allegation is of recovery of 504 litres of bear from a pick-up van.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is further submitted that no prudent person would use his own

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16669 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 2/2 vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated. It is next submitted that petitioner came to be implicated based on confessional statement of Ranjay Kumar in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value in the eye of law, when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedent.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Hajipur Excise P.S. Case No. 499 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T