Vibhishan Kumar @ Bibhisan Kumar @ Dheeraj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16813 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2019 Thana- BAIKUNTHPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Vibhishan Kumar @ Bibhisan Kumar @ Dheeraj Kumar Singh Son of Gourishankar Singh @ Gauri Shankar Singh R/o Village- Kishanpura, P.S.- Basantpur (Lakadi Naviganj O.P.), District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikash Kumar Shukla, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 12-07-2024 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Baikunthpur P.S. Case No.162 of 2019 under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against three unknown accused persons and none were arrested against whom there is allegation of snatching cash of Rs.22700/- with mobile of the informant on gun point.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the petitioner has not been apprehended from the place of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16813 of 2024(5) dt.12-07-2024 2/2 occurrence and his name has come by virtue of statement made by the co-accused persons. He submits that nothing recovered from the petitioner's possession.

5. Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean and there is three criminal antecedent of the petitioner in which he is on bail in two cases and in one case, he is persuading for bail.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner has not come with clean in this Court. He has initially intimated that there is one criminal case pending against him, but after receiving submissions of the case diary, he has filed supplementary affidavit and discloses that there are three criminal cases pending against him.

7. In the present facts and circumstances and the allegations against the petitioner that many of the cases is of dacoity, robbery, Arms Act and N.D.P.S. Act., this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T