Binod Mahto @ Vinod Mahto And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46691 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2017 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Binod Mahto @ Vinod Mahto son of Chandeshwar Mahto R/o Village - Orlahiya, P.S. - Sahiyara, District - Sitamarhi. 2.

Deepak Kumar son of Sri Ram Pravesh Bhagat R/o Village - Vishunpur Adhar, P.S. - Kanhauli, District - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. AKSHAY LAL PANDIT ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 21-09-2017 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 279, 337, 338, 272 and 273 of the I.P.C. and Section 30 (a), 32(2), 35(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 .

It is contended that, as per allegation, 33 litres of Nepali wine were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioners claim that they are having clean antecedents and are in custody since 17.8.2017. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46691 of 2017(2) dt.21-09-2017 2/2 Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 239 of 2017. If the petitioners, after their release in this case, are again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- U T