Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12172/2016bail granted

Lalan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-03-16Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12172 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -267 Year- 2015 Thana -GAYA MUFFSIL District- GAYA ====================================================== Lalan Singh son of Jugeshwar Singh, resident of Village- Bareb, Police Station- Muffassil, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 16-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 384, 395, 379 and 461 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 267 of 2015.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated owing to disputes arising in connection with running of business of crusher in which the informant insisted to be taken as a partner.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, as such, in the event of the arrest or surrender of the petitioner before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12172 of 2016 (2) dt.16-03-2016 2/2 petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 267 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- U T