Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34562 of 2017 (2) dt.28-07-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34562 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -51 Year- 2017 Thana -DHANARUA District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Ajit Kumar Son of Chandan Pratap Singh, R/o Village- Rakashia Dayal Chak, P.S.- Sakurabad, District- Jehanabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vindhyakeshri Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 51 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 25(1B)a, 26/35 of Arms Act. Prosecution case that police on informant that some persons were sitting near Dargah in suspicion condition, raided the place and seized one loaded pistol from co-accused of this case and from the petitioner one cartridge and a mobile was recovered. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated and there is nothing available on record to suggest that petitioner and others were planning to commit any offene. Further petitioner has been in judicial custody since 01.03.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34562 of 2017 (2) dt.28-07-2017 circumstances of the case nature of allegation and the period of custody, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Masaurhi, Patna in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 51 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T