Vijay Kapri And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5616 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Vijay Kapri S/o Santlal Kapri Village + P.O. Durmatta, Block - Sangrampur, District - Munger

2. Bramhdeo Prasad Singh S/o Rajeshwar Singh Village + P.O. Durmatta, Block - Sangrampur, District - Munger

3. R.K. Singh S/o Manoj Kumar Singh Village + P.O. Durmatta, Block - Sangrampur, District - Munger

4. Umesh Yadav S/o Ruko Yadav Village + P.O. Durmatta, Block - Sangrampur, District - Munger .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Engineer in Chief, ( South ) Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Bhagalpur

5. The Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department, Haweli Khadagpur, District - Munger

6. The Executive Engineer, Sinchai Pramandal, Tarapur, District - Munger

7. The Divisional Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger

8. The District Magistrate, District Munger

9. The Sub - Divisional Magistrate, Tarapur, District - Munger .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Purushottam Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Avandhya Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Sweta Kumari, Adv.

Ms. Sandhya Kumari, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma- AAG-5 Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 11-07-2016 Heard Mr. Purushottam Kumar Jha, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, and Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, Assistant Counsel to learned Additional

Patna High Court CWJC No.5616 of 2016 (2) dt.11-07-2016 2/2 Advocate General No.5, appearing on behalf of the Staterespondents. After some argument, learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) K.C.jha/- U T