Triloki Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14025 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2025 Thana- BADHAILA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Triloki Ram S/o Dashrath Ram Resident of Village- Kushdhar, P.S.- Baghaila, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103 (1) and 3 (5) of BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, daughter of informant got married to co-accused Bajrangi Kumar on 06.06.2023 and after marriage she went to her matrimonial house. It is further alleged that on 06.02.2025, co-accused Bajrangi Kumar informed the informant that his daughter had died. Upon reaching the matrimonial house, the informant found her lying dead. The informant harbours a strong suspicion that the accused persons have culpably caused the death of his daughter.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is brother-in -law ( bhaisur) of deceased. Allegation is general and omnibus against this petitioner. Petitioner is simply

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14025 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026 2/2 victim of over implications. Informant is not an eye witness to the alleged occurrence. As a matter of fact, deceased died a natural death. Petitioner is separate in mess and property and got no concern with the affairs of deceased and her husband. It is further orally submitted that thrust of accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, and other circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Baghaila Police Station Case No. 21 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS), 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) khushbu/- U T