Kanhai Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16636 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2024 Thana- MANJHAUL District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.
Kanhai Thakur Son of Biro Thakur R/o Village - Pakkisarai, P.S.- Ghogha, District - Bhagalpur 2.
Sourabh Kumar Son of Naresh Mandal R/o Village - Pakkisarai, P.S.- Ghogha, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anupa Nand Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 309(4), 109, 123, 61(2), 3, 5 of the BNS.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with others booked the swift desire car of the informant's son and in the way, they administered some intoxicant articles to the son of the informant and tried to abduct him. When the police stopped them, the accused persons tried to flew away, out of four accused persons, three were arrested on the spot and one of them managed to flee away. Hence the present FIR.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16636 of 2025(2) dt.11-04-2025 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that actually the petitioners are themselves victimized by the accused, namely, Shakti Prakash Singh, who managed to flee away. It is further submitted that the vehicle has been recovered and the same has been released in favour of the son of the informant. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 11.10.2024 having no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with Manjhoul P.S. Case No. 79 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Begusarai.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Jagdish/- U T