← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18429/2019bail granted

Bhola Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2019-03-27Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18429 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2018 Thana- MAINATAND District- West Champaran ====================================================== BHOLA PASWAN Son of Late Yogendra Paswan Resident of VillageChiwtaha, P.S.- Mainatand, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Mainatand P.S. Case No. 10/2018, instituted for offence under Section(s) 25(1-b)A and 26(2) of Arms Act.

It is alleged in the written report that on 01.02.2018 at 5:50 A.M. informant recorded his self statement at the door of petitioner stating therein that on the basis of confessional statement of petitioner, informant along with other police personnel arrived at the house of petitioner. On search, a Samsung Mobile and country made Katta kept in plastic bag were recovered hidden in the "Tati".

Petitioner is in custody since 15.02.2018.

Keeping in view the period of custody already spent by the petitioner, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18429 of 2019(2) dt.27-03-2019 2/2 allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Mainatand P.S. Case No. 10/2018, subject to the conditions that (I) both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(II) Petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and (III) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T