← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7845/2021dismissed

Gautam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-04Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad,Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7845 of 2021 ====================================================== Gautam Kumar, S/o Krishna Singh, Resident of Village- Fatehpur, Salehpur, Panchayat-Akthu Kachanpur, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2.

The District Selection Committee, through its Chairman, District Magistrate, Gaya.

3.

The District Magistrate, Gaya.

4.

The District Supply Officer, Gaya.

5.

The Sub- Divisional Officer, Sadar, Gaya.

6.

The Block Supply Officer, Belaganj, Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr.Vijay Anand, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 04-02-2022 The matter has been taken up for online hearing through video conference because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

The petitioner is seeking a direction from this Court to the respondents to transfer petitioner's name in the place of his grandfather, who is a licensee of a Fair Price Shop under the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016, vide Licence No.50/2006.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7845 of 2021(2) dt.04-02-2022 2/2 It is asserted that the petitioner's father had died in a police firing on 01.03.2006, whereafter a licence to run the Fair Price Shop was granted in favour of the petitioner's grandfather, since he was, at the said point of time, a minor. Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has not been able to point out any provision under the Control Order, 2016 which permits such transfer of licence.

In our opinion, the relief sought in the present writ application is misconceived and is dismissed accordingly. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) (Madhuresh Prasad, J) PNM U