Ramvali Rout v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15529 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2024 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Sheohar ====================================================== 1.
Ramvali Rout Son of Indal Rout @ Pyare Raut Resident of Village- Barahi Jagdish Tola, Ward No. 15, P.S.- Puranahiya, Distt.- Sheohar 2.
Kuber Raut Son of Indal Rout @ Pyare Raut Resident of Village- Barahi Jagdish Tola, Ward No. 15, P.S.- Puranahiya, Distt.- Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gautam Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Jai Ram Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Informant.
2. The petitioners who apprehend arrest in connection with Sheohar Cyber P.S. Case No. 16/2024 lodged 27.12.2024, for the offences punishable under sections 318(4) and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act.
3.As per the prosecution, the F.I.R. has been lodged, alleging that a cyber crime was committed by fraudulently withdrawing a total of Rs. 1,04,999/- from the informant's bank account.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15529 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/3 petitioners are innocent and have committed no offense. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners are simple persons who used to work in West Bengal for a private firm, but under a conspiracy, their names have been wrongly included in the present case. He further submits that, from the content of the F.I.R., it becomes crystal clear that the alleged money has been withheld at the instance of the Cyber Police. The antecedents of the petitioners are clean. However, the petitioners are ready to fulfill any conditions that may be imposed upon them. He further submits that, alternatively, the petitioners undertake to deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) before the Trial Court, subject to the outcome of the present case.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the hard-earned money of the informant has been fraudulently withdrawn from the informant's bank account by the petitioners.
6. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, particularly considering that the petitioners are ready to deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) each before the Trial Court within two months from today, subject to the outcome of the present case, let the above-named petitioners be released on bail, but only after showing substantial proof of the deposit
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15529 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 3/3 of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) by both petitioners separately within the aforementioned period before the Trial Court, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within the aforesaid period, on furnishing bail bond of ₹30000/- (thirty thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1) (d) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Sheohar, in connection with Sheohar Cyber P.S. Case No.16/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U T