Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45324/2017rejected

Dhananjay Yadav @ Sadhu Yadav @ Dhananjay v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-08Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45324 of 2017 (4) dt.08-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45324 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -5 Year- 2015 Thana -GOVINDPUR District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Dhananjay Yadav @ Sadhu Yadav @ Dhananjay, S/o Jagdeo Yadav, Resident of village- Harnarayanpur, P.S.- Govindpur, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-11-2017 Heard Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier twice rejected vide order dated 22.09.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No.22449 of 2015 and vide order dated 11.01.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.35064 of 2016 with a direction to the trial court to conclude the trial within six months from the date of receipt of this order but the trial could not be concluded and the petitioner again filed this bail petition. Vide order dated 01.11.2017, the S.P., Nawada was directed to appear in Court. In pursuance of the order aforesaid, the S.P., Nawada is present in Court and submitted by filing affidavit that all the prosecution witnesses have already been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45324 of 2017 (4) dt.08-11-2017 examined. Of course, the petitioner is in jail for more than 21⁄2 years but since all the prosecution witnesses have already been examined and the trial is at its fag end, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the bail petition is dismissed. The trial court is directed to conclude the hearing as soon as possible and dispose of the case preferably within two months. The personal attendance of S.P. is dispensed with.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Saurabh/- U T