Abhishek Kumar Singh @ Abhishek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24935 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -206 Year- 2016 Thana -TARAIYA District- SARAN ====================================================== ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH @ ABHISHEK KUMAR Son of Sri Madhav Singh Resident of Village- Lauwan, P.S. Taraiya, District Saran. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Taraiya P.S.Case No. 206 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 496 and 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation is that petitioner has committed rape upon the prosecutrix on the assurance of marriage and later on he refused to marry her and married one another girl. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as per FIR the relationship between the petitioner and victim was continuing for 12 years and she became major in the year 2008 and she is consenting party. It has further been submitted that according to FIR petitioner has married the victim girl in a temple and, accordingly, allegation of committing rape is not made out against the petitioner and he is in custody since 22.3.2017. Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant also. They have opposed the prayer for bail stating that the petitioner has committed rape on the assurance of marriage
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24935 of 2017 (3) dt.05-07-2017 2/2 and, as such, he does not deserve bail.
Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Saran, Chapra, in connection with Taraiya P.S.Case No. 206 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U