Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48698/2017bail granted

Dilip Lambu @ Banti @ Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48698 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48698 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -121 Year- 2017 Thana -SOHSARAI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. DILIP LAMBU @ BANTI @ MUKESH KUMAR Son of Kedar Tanti, R/o Mohalla- Jalalpur, P.S.- Sohsarai, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sohsarai P.S. Case No. 121 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30 and 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 330 litres of illegal spirit from a car.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and his name has been disclosed by the co-accused of this case. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since30.08.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48698 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 6th Additional District and Sessions Judge -Cum-Special Judge, Excise, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Sohsarai P.S. Case No. 121 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T