Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47802/2017bail granted

Sanjay Bind @ Sanjay Bin v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47802 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47802 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -86 Year- 2017 Thana -RAGHUNATHPUR District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. SANJAY BIND @ SANJAY BIN, S/o Umashankar Bin @ Bimal Bin, Resident of Gabhirar Bindtolwa, P.s.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 86 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30/38 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 243 litres of from a school and it is alleged that said liquor belonged to petitioner and other co-accused.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made from a toilet of the Govt. Middle School. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 27.07.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47802 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge -II, Siwan, in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 86 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T