← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18936/2024allowed

Md. Monu Ansari @ Kaif Ansari @ Md. Kaif Ansari @ Monu Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-02Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18936 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2023 Thana- GARHI District- Jamui ====================================================== Md. Monu Ansari @ Kaif Ansari @ Md. Kaif Ansari @ Monu Ansari SON OF Md. Mustakim Ansari @ Mustakim Mian RESIDENT OF VILLAGEARUNMABANK, PS- GARHI, DIST- JAMUI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mala Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No.1, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2024 Heard Mr. Mala Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. All the F.I.R. named accused persons including the petitioner, on non-fulfillment of demand of dowry, in furtherance of the common intention are said to have committed murder of the daughter of the informant after administering poison to her.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and he has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18936 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 2/2 Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He is brother-in-law of the deceased. He has no role in the alleged occurrence. The husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody since 05.06.2023. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is no specific overt act against the petitioner and the husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Garhi P.S. Case No. 09 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T