Binod Yadav @ Binod Kumar Yadav @ Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14391 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2025 Thana- SAUR BAZAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Binod Yadav @ Binod Kumar Yadav @ Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Yadav Son of Late Kripali Yadav Resident of Village - Kanp Paschimi, Ward No.- 7, Police Station - Sour Bazar, District - Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vivekanand Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-05-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 08.12.2025 and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land, on orders of Vijay, the petitioner assaulted his brother by an iron rod causing injury on head.

4. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14391 of 2026(2) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is further submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the blow is not alleged to have been repeated and petitioner is not a criminal but then it is fairly submitted that the injury has been opined to be grievous. It is next submitted that if privilege of regular bail is granted, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sour Bazar P.S. Case No.248 of 2025.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T