Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10925/2018bail granted

Jai Prakash Kumar @ Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-26Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10925 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28779 Year-2014 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Jai Prakash Kumar @ Anil Kumar, Son of Naresh Ram, Resident of VillageSonachak, P.S.- Gaurichak, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Kumari Suman Priya @ Suman Kumari, D/o Jagdish Ram,

3. Jagdish Ram, Son of Late Ram Lakhan Ram, Both residents of VillageBadulahchak, P.S.- Parsa Bazar, District- Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. UPENDRA KUMAR ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 and 3. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2017 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10925 of 2018(2) dt.26-02-2018 2/2 the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2 and 3, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Patna in connection with Complaint case No.28779C of 2014. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T