Surendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20385 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-419 Year-2022 Thana- KHAIRA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Surendra Singh SON OF Late Ram Sharan Singh RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KOREYA, PS- KHAIRA, DISTT- SARAN 2.

SIKANDAR SINGH SON OF RAM BALAK SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KOREYA, PS- KHAIRA, DISTT- SARAN 3.

RAMAWATI DEVI WIFE OF SURENDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KOREYA, PS- KHAIRA, DISTT- SARAN 4.

KAMLESH KUMAR SON OF DHURENDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KOREYA, PS- KHAIRA, DISTT- SARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Braj Kishore Pd., A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2024

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioners no. 1, 2 and 4.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioners no. 1, 2 and 4.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no. 3, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

5. The petitioner no. 3 apprehends her arrest in a case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20385 of 2024(3) dt.08-07-2024 2/3 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379/34 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner no. 3 submits that petitioner no. 3 has antecedent of two cases and is a woman but then the cases were instituted by the side of the informant. It is further submitted that the informant alleges that all the accused persons came on 03.11.2022 and assaulted her causing injury on her head and body, thereafter she was taken to the hospital where her fardbeyan was recorded on 04.11.2022 and the FIR came to be instituted on 16.11.2022, thereafter the informant died during the course of treatment.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner no. 3 submits that from perusal of the injury report, it would manifest that the deceased suffered one injury and the allegation of assault against the petitioner no. 3 is not specific.

8. Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner no. 3.

9. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner no. 3, the petitioner no. 3 abovenamed, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20385 of 2024(3) dt.08-07-2024 3/3 released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kahira P.S. Case No. 419 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T