← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17070/2019bail rejected

Rajeeb Manjhi @ Rajeev Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-25Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17070 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2018 Thana- BUNIYAD GANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== RAJEEB MANJHI @ RAJEEV MANJHI, Son of Madhusudan Manjhi Resident of Village- Govindpur, P.S.- Belaganj, Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2019 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 73 of 2018, registered under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya. The accusation is that since 18.04.2018, Ajay Kumar Sao, son of the informant, was missing on search no trace was found. Thereafter, on 21.04.2018 the dead body of Ajay Kumar Sao was found lying near Muskan Petrol Pump. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. In course of investigation the Police recorded confessional statement of Arti Kumari, who disclosed that due to her illicit

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17070 of 2019(7) dt.25-07-2019 2/2 relation with the deceased, her husband Mordhwaj Manjhi in connivance with the petitioner committed murder of son of informant, except the confessional statement of Arti Kumari nothing has been collected by the I.O of this case. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T