Bishundeo @ Indu Bishwakarma v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42424 of 2017 (2) dt.14-09-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42424 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -212 Year- 2017 Thana -MAKHDUMPUR District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Bishundeo @ Indu Bishwakarma, Son of Late Ramchandra Bishwakarma, Resident of Village- Thikraur, P.S.- Makhdoompur, DistrictJehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Mistry For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 212 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 333 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a)(d)/45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Prosecution story is that police on informant that some persons were manufacturing country made liquor raided the spot, where the police personal were assaulted.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R and he has been made accused in this case only on the basis of suspicion. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 01.08.2017.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42424 of 2017 (2) dt.14-09-2017 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Jehanabad, in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 212 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T