Patna High CourtCR. WJC/292/2016disposed

Gajendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna And ORS.

2016-07-21The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.292 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Gajendra Prasad Son of Late Raghuni Prasad, resident of Village-Hurari, P.S. Dhanarua, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Inspector General of Police, Patna.

3. Senior Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad.

4. Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad.

5. S.H.O. Ghosi, P.S. Ghosi, District Jehanabad.

6. The Investigating Officer (Shrawan Kumar Jha) Sub Inspector of Police, P.S. Ghosi, District- Jehanabad.

7. Dhananjay Kumar Son of Ram Prit Yadav

8. Ram Prit Yadav Son of Late Dev Lakshan Yadav

9. Bipin Kumar Son of Ram Prit Yadav

10. Kosmi Devi wife of Ram Prit Yadav

11. Lalo Devi daughter of Ram Prit Yadav respondent no. 7 to 11 are resident of Village- Pritam Bigha, P.S. Ghosi District- Jehanabad. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC31-P.S. Sahay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 21-07-2016 Heard Mr. Bimal Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. P.S. Sahay, learned Standing Counsel No.31, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. Having considered the averments made in the writ petition and materials on record and upon hearing the parties, it is hereby directed that respondent No.3, namely, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad, shall enquire into the grievances raised in the writ petition, do the needful in accordance with law and get the investigation of Ghosi (Okari)

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.292 of 2016 (2) dt.21-07-2016 2/2 P.S. Case No. 142 of 2015 completed expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months, ensuring proper, fair and effective investigation in such a way that no innocent person is harassed. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) K.C.jha/- U T