← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5435/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

Dr. Sankalp And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-11-14Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 5435 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Dr Sankalp, Son of Sushil Kumar Jha, resident of House No 100, Near Reliance Tower, Nirala Nagar Colony, Digha, Police Station - Digha, District - Patna, Bihar 800011 2.

Dr Rizwanullah, son of Nasir Ahmad, resident of village - Inerwa, Police Station - Adapur, District - East Champaran at Motihari Bihar 845301 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Joint Secretary, Department of Health , Government of Bihar , Patna. 4.

The Director, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sheikhpura, Patna - 800014 5.

The Finance and Chief Accounts Officer, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences Sheikhpura, Patna - 800 014 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

N O N E For the S t a t e :

Mr Mujtabaul Haque, GP XII Mr Vasant Vikas, AC to GP XII For Respondents 4 & 5 :

Mr Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 14-11-2019 Petitioners have filed the writ petition claiming the benefits of non-practicing allowance at par with that granted in All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. Learned counsel for the respondent-Institute submits that under Office Order dated 31.03.2016 issued by the Director (Annexure A to the counter affidavit), the admissible nonpracticing allowance + TA + other allowances have been granted

Patna High Court CWJC No.5435 of 2016(2) dt.14-11-2019 2/2 to both the petitioners.

None appears on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, without going into the merits of the said submission, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U