The Punjab National Bank And ORS v. Raghubir Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1141 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2289 of 2012 ===========================================================

1. The Punjab National Bank Through Its Chairman Pf & Pension Fund Department, 3rd Floor, Rajendra Bhawan, Rajendra Place, New Delhi - 110008

2. The General Manager, Provident Fund And Pension Fund Department, Head Office 3rd Floor Rajendra Bhawan, Rajendra Place, New Delhi - 110008

3. Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank, Boring Road, Patna

4. Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Mohini (Mahua Gachhi), Patna

5. Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Rishiap Of Branch, District - Aurangabad .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

Raghubir Singh S/O Late Nageshwar Singh Resident Of Village - Jhajhilal P.S. - Pupri, District - Sitamarhi .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI And HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 10-01-2017 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

Certain new facts are incorporated and brought on record to assail the decision of the Learned Single Judge, passed in C. W. J. C. No. 2289 of 2012.

These additional materials or ground or evidence cannot form the basis of setting aside the order of Learned Single Judge, who did not have any opportunity to look into those materials which is being used at the time of argument in appeal.

Patna High Court LPA No.1141 of 2013 dt.10-01-2017 2/2 This appeal is dismissed.

If the appellants feel that a case for review is made out, they may take appropriate steps in this regard. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) SKM/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE Uploading Date 12.01.2017 Transmission Date