Baliraj Sahani v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.15388 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -877 Year- 2014 Thana -EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Baliraj Sahani Son of Hira Sahani .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Jai Prakash Kumar son of Ramyash Sahani .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr.M.K.Gautam(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-04-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a complaint case wherein process has been directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the complainant purchased a Bolero from one of his relative Sandeep Sahani and paid Rs.7,26,000/-. Subsequently, the vehicle was seized from the complainant as the vehicle was hypothecated by financer. The complainant, subsequently, given a tractor on the undertaking that till return of alleged amount the complainant can use the tractor. It is alleged against the petitioner that the petitioner only mediated the matter between the accused Sandeep Sahni
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15388 of 2015 (2) dt.15-04-2015 2/2 and the complainant.
Considering the thrust of accusation is against Sandeep Sahni, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Trial No.1497 of 2014 arising out of Complaint Case No. C-877 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U T