← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/714/2019disposed

Ashok Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-07Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.714 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10441 of 2011 ====================================================== ASHOK KUMAR SINHA S/o Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh Vill.- Rampur Hari, Dist.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. K.K.Pathak, The Principal Secretary, Department of Industry, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

Mr. Narendra Kumar Sinha Director, Handloom and Sericulture, Department of Industry, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

Mr. Raman Kumar Principal, Bihar Industries of Silk and Textile, Nath Nagar, Bhagalpur 4.

Mr. Manish Kumar Treasury Officer, Bhagalpur 5.

The Accountant General (Accounts and Expenditure) , Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Subhash Prasad Singh (Ga3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-12-2022 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties, it has transpired that this Court's order dated 16.03.2018, passed in CWJC No. 10441 of 2011, has been complied with.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has, however, submitted that though the order has been complied with but belatedly, for which the petitioner is entitled to due compensation in the form of statutory interest. On perusal of the order of this Court dated

Patna High Court MJC No.714 of 2019(12) dt.07-12-2022 2/2 16.03.2018, I do not find any direction issued by this Court for payment of statutory interest. Non-payment of statutory interest therefore, in the facts and circumstances, does not constitute deliberate disobedience of this Court's order. It goes without saying that the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise before appropriate Forum/Court, his claim for payment of statutory interest on delayed payment of the amount, which has already been paid to him.

The contempt proceeding stands dropped with the aforesaid liberty.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) anand/- U