Prince Kumar @ Prins Kumar @ Piyush Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16539 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2024 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Prince Kumar @ Prins Kumar @ Piyush Kumar, S/o- Jitendra Ray, VillageRupauli Shitalpatti, ward No.6, P.S- Mufassil, Dist. Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumar Praveen, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-05-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mushrigharari P.S. Case No. 140 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 61(2) BNS and Sections 25(1-b)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
3. The police on a tip off assemblage of miscreants conducted raid, however, noticing the police party, out of ten persons, four of them succeeded in fleeing away and the police apprehended five persons along with a white colour Punch Car, bearing registration no. BR.33BD- 4227. In course of search, one country made pistol and two live cartridges with a magazine and also some iron made weapon were recovered.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16539 of 2025(3) dt.14-05-2025 2/3 the petitioner has neither any concern with the accused persons, who were apprehended, nor with the car, in question, from where recovery has been made. Save and except the disclosure made by the apprehended persons, there is no material suggesting the complicity of the petitioner in the crime. The petitioner is a boy of tender age and, as such, sending him behind the bar would jeopardize his entire career, apart from the fact he is having fair antecedent. It is further submitted that even during the course of investigation no other incriminating material has been collected against the petitioner nor any material has been recovered from his whereabouts.
5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State opposes the bail application and submits that the name of the petitioner has been disclosed by the apprehended persons.
6. Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the tender age of the petitioner with fair antecedent, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16539 of 2025(3) dt.14-05-2025 3/3 connection with Mushrigharari P.S. Case No. 140 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close relative of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J) uday/- U T