Imtiyaz Shah v. The State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14446 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Imtiyaz Shah, Son of Late Khedaran Sah, Resident of Village - Sikanderpur, P.S.- Chainpur, Distt.- Kaimur (Bhabua).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Afsari Begam, Wife of Imteyaz Sah, D/o julfekar Sah, Resident of Village - Sikanderpur, P.S.- Chainpur, Distt.- Kaimur (Bhabua) at Present resident of Village - Kotsa, P.S.- Durgawati, Distt.- Kaimur (Bhabua). ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vinod Kumar Seth, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-06-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Mahila (Bhabua) P.S. Case No.71 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 498A, 307, 34 of the IPC. Allegation as per written report is that the accused persons including the petitioner were demanding motorcycle, golden chain, buffalo, etc. due to that assaulted the opposite party no.2 and they have fractured her hand and also tried to set her on fire.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, she fell down and received injuries and he got her threatened also.
Heard learned A.P.P. and learned counsel appearing on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14446 of 2019(5) dt.26-06-2019 2/2 behalf of the informant, who has opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides, in view of the allegations mentioned above and seriousness of the injuries, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on its own merit, without being prejudiced by order of this Court. With the aforesaid, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T