Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28656/2014dismissed

Ranjeet Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-07-14Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28656 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -104 Year- 2013 Thana -DUMRA District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Son of Deo Narayan Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Sirsiya, P.S. - Bathnaha, District - Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Anita Kumari Wife of Ranjeet Kumar alias Mukesh Kumar D/o Siya Ram Roy At present residing at Village - Bishwanathpur, P.S. - Dumra, District - Sitamarhi .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binoy Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07/ 14-07-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner being the husband of the informant is apprehending his arrest in Dumra P.S. Case No. 104 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 384, 386 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi. On the joint prayer of petitioner and the informant the matter was referred to Mediation Centre of State Legal Service Authority vide order dated 18.03.2015. The petitioner and opposite party no. 2 were directed to appear before

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28656 of 2014 (7) dt.14-07-2015 2/2 the Mediator on 30.03.2015. The report of the Mediator dated 30.06.2015 at Flag 'X' reflects that the petitioner never appeared, though, opposite party no. 2 along with her counsel appeared. . It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in spite of the fact that the petitioner was intimated about the order of this Court dated 18.03.2015 but neither he participated in the mediation nor he is instructing his counsel any more.

In the circumstances, this application is dismissed.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T