← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14413/2023dismissed

Vikram Kumar @ Vikram Paswan @ Roney Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-22Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14413 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2020 Thana- SAKSOHRA District- Patna ====================================================== VIKRAM KUMAR @ VIKRAM PASWAN @ RONEY KUMAR SON OF BINOD PASWAN @ BINOD KUMAR R/O VILLAGE- BHAGA BIGHA, P.S.- SAKSOHRA, DISTRICT- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suraj Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Saksohara P.S. Case No.12/2020, registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 325, 379, 307, 504 and 34 of the IPC. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner gave an iron blow over the head of the informant. Thereafter, other accused persons also assaulted him and looted his money. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. It is submitted that the parties have compromised the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14413 of 2023(3) dt.22-06-2023 2/2 case. He has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that the injury of the victim was found grievous in nature.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. This application is accordingly dismissed.

However, petitioner is at liberty to surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass order, preferably, on the same day, in accordance with law, considering that there is a compromise between the parties. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T