← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4582/2019withdrawn

Surendra Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS

2019-12-17The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4582 of 2019 ====================================================== Surendra Singh Son of late Rambansh Singh Resident of Ward No. 8, Nokha, Police Station-Nokha, District-Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India through Secretary Ministry of Railway, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

2.

General Manager(Operation), East Central Railway, Hajipur. 3.

Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Pandit Dindeyal Upadhyay, Mugalsarai.

4.

Senior Divisional Manager, East Central Railway, Pandit Dindeyal Upadhyay,Mugalsarai.

5.

Commissioner Railway Safety, East Zone, Kolkata. 6.

Commercial Manager, Sasaram, Railway Station, Sasaram. 7.

Station Manager Nokha Railway Station, Nokha, District- Rohtas. 8.

The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. 9.

Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sasaram, District- Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Dipak For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 17-12-2019 This application has been preferred praying inter alia for the following relief/s:

"for issuance of an appropriate writ or writs directing the respondents not to construct under pass road at the Railway Gate No.1.C/60 Nokha-Sanjhauli distance 75/06-07 and to construct the flyover at the railway gate in question which will in the interest of

Patna High Court CWJC No.4582 of 2019(7) dt.17-12-2019 2/2 public at large for which petitioner and villagers filed a detail representation dated 24.1.2019 before the respondent and or to grant any other relief or reliefs for which petitioner is legally entitled in the fact and circumstances of the case."

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.Jha/- U