Bahadur Rana v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35692 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2016 Thana -BARHAT District- JAMUI ====================================================== Bahadur Rana, Son of Late Bhola Rana, Resident of Village Gurmaha, Police Station- Barhat, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan (APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier twice rejected vide order dated 15.07.2016 and 15.02.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. 21506 of 2016 and Cr. Misc. No. 5966 of 2017 respectively, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 08.01.2016 but up-till now only charges have been framed and no prosecution witness has been examined and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded. The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that trial has not been concluded and the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35692 of 2017 (2) dt.09-08-2017 2/2 petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Jamui, in connection with U.A.P. Case No. 02 of 2016 arising out of Barhat P.S. Case No. 01 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T